NOT KNOWN FACTS ABOUT BAIL CASE LAW ON SEC 337 A II PPC

Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc

Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc

Blog Article

These provisions use to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even when the transaction occurred ahead of its promulgation. Read more

It's also important to note that granting of seniority into a civil servant without the actual duration of service practically violates the complete service framework for a civil servant inducted in Quality seventeen by claiming these types of benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention of the legislation nor on the equity. Read more

Today educational writers are often cited in legal argument and decisions as persuasive authority; often, These are cited when judges are attempting to put into practice reasoning that other courts have not nevertheless adopted, or when the judge thinks the educational's restatement of the legislation is more compelling than might be found in case legislation. Thus common legislation systems are adopting one of many methods extended-held in civil legislation jurisdictions.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to the determination in the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but aren't technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]

Consequently, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has got to pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these types of an appeal has not still been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner might then seek further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more

Given that the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been attained, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice of your Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to contemplate all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a few of the relevant factors. Read more

Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons acquiring their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to accomplish click here away with the candidature in the petitioner. Read more

Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common law, is usually a legislation that is based on precedents, that may be the judicial decisions from previous cases, somewhat than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.

Accomplishing a case law search can be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case legislation searches, which include:

Problems or Errors In the event you encounter any technical problems with this website (such as a terrible link or a portion of an opinion lacking), please notify the eService Centre.

17 . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have heard the discovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession with the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this element for interim custody of the subject premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a very well-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.

Report this page